Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel D's avatar

This entire essay was excellent, especially this paragraph:

<<"Ultimately, there are three choices with respect to a society’s policing: 1) Have an armed populace that polices itself through self-defence when official law enforcement is unavailable, 2) Disarm your population but have an intrusive and likely oppressive police state apparatus, or 3) Disarm your population but don’t do state policing, leaving people at the mercy of criminals. This last is what is currently being done, with a side dose of criminals being used as regime enforcers (at least temporarily) in place of formal state security. The whole point is to bullycide you and me into accepting this state of affairs as “necessary” for the cause of holy democracy.">>

That's the game plan the Marxcissists are using to foment sufficient desperation among the populace for people to be willing to accept a police state to bring some semblance of order and the possibility of a better future. The Marxcissists' problem is, they are not the only ones who can make such promises; others will be able to play that game and play it better and more credibly. The Left is creating the stage for an American Caesar to emerge. The Founders gave us a Republic -- if we could keep it; we have not kept it, and I doubt it will be restored, given all the Marxcissists have done to destroy the old order. Our civilizational descent into clownworld absurdity is such a shitshow, it's not even a tragedy; it's a farce.

Expand full comment
Sarge's avatar

And you are correct in saying that in order for us to have law and order and effective government, we need a high-trust, homogeneous society, and the GloboHomo rulers are doing their best to make sure we can never again have that through the massive invasion of third world illiterates they are delivering into every Western white nation....

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts