Western Civilisation at the Crossroads

The decision better be made quickly before we reach the point of no return

A few weeks ago our family was preparing to go on a road trip to visit some relatives out of state and go on a vacation. Among other things, we had a bag neatly packed with snacks and other food ready to go. Well, one evening while we were out, one of the dogs got into the bag. This creature ripped open and ate up a bunch of the food, and even the things which he didn’t eat he still tore open, spread all over the floor, and generally ruined so that the food was now inedible.

I struck me that, in miniature, this is really a metaphor for what we see going on in the United States, Canada, Europe, and other western nations. This dog’s actions are strikingly similar to those of the third-world biotrash that is flooding into the West from all across the global south. You had a creature who didn’t really have any claim to the bag of snacks, it didn’t belong to him, nevertheless intrude himself into a place he shouldn’t have been, steal what he wanted, and ruin what he didn’t. I suppose I should be thankful he didn’t poop all over the floor while he was doing it.

In a much more serious fashion, this perspective brings into focus the current situation we see in Los Angeles, California. We are seeing illegal aliens and their supporters openly, brazenly, attacking federal law enforcement agents from ICE who are enforcing our immigration laws. The rioting has gone on for three days now, with National Guard troops finally being brought into quell the disturbances. There is talk (as of this writing) of Marines from nearly Camp Pendleton being brought in as well.

For decades, California has been ground zero for an invasion that has overturned the demographics of the state (93% White in 1950 to 34% white in 2020) and taken what was once a veritable Garden of Eden along the Pacific and turned many parts of it into a trash-covered, crime-infested barrio. Much the same has been happening to Minnesota because of Somalis. And to Ohio and Pennsylvania because of Haitians. And to Texas because of Venezuelans. And to Canada because of Indians and Pakistanis. And to the United Kingdom and most of western Europe because of “migrants” from all over the third world. Indeed, Europe recently saw its own bout of rioting, with several nights of disturbances taking place across France and nearby regions.

In each case, the pattern is the same - people who are in places they don’t belong, acting like they’re entitled to things that don’t belong to them, and violently resisting when clear-minded people try to set things back into order. For decades, prescient observers have noted that what was taking place across the West was an invasion. The violent resistance to removal and remigration seen in many places right now demonstrates just how literally that observation was meant to be. When you have foreign nationals waving foreign flags while they fight against foreign police personnel as they resist being removed from foreign soil that they’ve been occupying without permission, what other term would even be appropriate to use?

At its root, the cause of this is liberalism - not just the modern progressive/socialism/Marxist type that people usually think of, but also “classical” liberalism. As has been noted elsewhere, liberalism (of any type) invariably leads to race communism. Any ideology that is based off of any variant of the blank slate theory, any ideology which views people as essentially fungible and interchangeable, is going to inevitably fall into that pit. Boomercons who justify the invasion by chirriping about “hard workin’ immugrunts jes’ doin’ jerbs Americans won’t do!” are as much a cause of the problem as any trooned-out antifa throwing Molotovs at the Man right now.

For decades westerners were able to kick the can down the road, putting off the inevitable for future generations to deal with. Well, it looks like the bill may finally be coming due. California is on fire because of Mexicans and Europe is in grave danger because of Muslims and Africans. But it was all engineered by bad actors who have infested our governments for decades. Businesses want cheap labour that have fewer expectations about things like benefits. Political parties like the Democrats in the USA want captive audiences of beholden voters to replace the natives who are increasingly turning away from them. In most cases, the damage done to native western populations is considered to be a feature, not a bug, by the transnational “elites” who infect our bodies politic.

The fact is that when you introduce masses of third worlders into your countries, your countries become progressively more third world in charactre. This is true across the board. With more third world immigration, western countries have seen more fraud, more abuse of social welfare programs, stagnant wages, increased housing costs, and more crime. And yes, I realise that the standard pro-immigrationist argument, based off of a few garbage studies by libertarian “think” tanks like the Cato Institute, will try to tell us that “immigrants actually have lower crime rates!!” These studies tend to have major methodological problems that invalidate their results. For instance, comparing native-born incarceration rates with those for criminal illegal immigrants is flawed because a large chunk of criminal aliens are simply deported back to their countries of origin, thus never entering into statistics for incarceration to begin with.

Logically, however, there’s no reason to think that if Mexico and large chunks of the rest of Latin America are full of crime, that Mexicans and other Latin Americans wouldn’t be bringing that along with them when they come here. After all, culture is culture and despite the fantasies of the blank slatists, people don’t lose their cultures just because they change their geography. This certainly isn’t the case in Europe where foreign migrants habitually account for grossly outsized shares of crime and other socially dysfunctional behaviours. There’s no reason to think the American situation would be any different. And indeed, it isn’t - the Cato Institute and other groups that turn out studies showing “lower immigrant crime rates” get their results by using shoddy statistical techniques and terrible data sources. In other words, the lived experiences of people on the ground residing in places with large immigrant populations isn’t just their imaginations.

And this isn’t even getting into the disproportionate contribution by blacks to the USA’s “native born crime rate” represented in the shorthand mnemonic “13 do 60.” When you look at crime rates among White Americans alone, even the most grossly misrepresented immigrant numbers from Alex Nowrasteh’s most fevered dream don’t come close to being as low.

The fact is that masses of immigrants are unnecessary and detrimental to our countries. We’re bombarded by assertions about the benefits of immigrants, yet the reality is that these benefits are…not all that apparent. Indeed, the reality of mass immigration is that it’s basically an extension of the DEI mentality applied outside of white-collar environments in that it couples the fallacious idea of the interchangeability of different groups with the ideological need to “punish” Whites for supposed past transgressions. In this case, rather than being passed over for a promotion, the punishment involves being replaced in your own homelands.

The third worldification of the West will only make our already bad collapse-phase situation worse. This is doubly so because the “human material” involved in this replacement is objective less capable of maintaining advanced, technological civilisation. For instance, I’d argue that the already observed decline in average American IQ is contributing to the USA’s transition from being an “innovator” nation to being a “maintainer” nation, from one that leads the way with new technologies and other advances to one that manages to keep the lights on but is otherwise unremarkable. The thing is - this drop isn’t the result of some great genetic or educational change in the founding and other pre-1924 stocks of the American population. It’s basically due to the influx of lower IQ black and brown populations from the global south, often times from nations with average IQs hovering in the 80-85 range. The more of these people you have in our countries, the more high IQ people you tie up just babysitting these people to (try to) keep them out of trouble.

It simply makes sense that the masses of third worlders who have come here will negatively impact our societies, because they have most definitely negatively impacted their own. They can screech about “colonialism” all they want, but the reality is that the reason third world countries are third world is because they’re filled with third world people who are incapable of creating or maintaining high civilisation. In many cases, these folks are coming from places that have such low average IQs that a huge chunk of their populations don’t even have a meaningful time sense but always live eternally in the present with no capacity to understand cause and effect or to plan for the future. They live in a sequentially disconnected series of “nows” that they never can quite put together. People like that, for better or worse, simply don’t have what it takes to build and maintain high culture or plan long-term for the future. As much as many don’t want to admit it, the third world really has nothing to offer to the West and other advanced nations of the world. You could, for instance, nuke Bangladesh off the face of the earth and we really wouldn’t be out anything. In the interests of benevolent yet neglectful charity we could leave these masses to themselves, but we’re certainly not doing ourselves any favours by letting large numbers of them into our lands.

Jean Raspail presciently wrote, “Your universe has no meaning to them. They will not try to understand. They will be tired, they will be cold, they will make a fire with your beautiful oak door...”

This perfectly captures the spirit of today’s “migration” crisis, which he foresaw over 50 years ago. Like the dog getting into the bag of food, these entrants have no claim to what they take, they simply snarfle and gorge and destroy. And they don’t even understand what they’re doing, other than satisfying some immediate felt needs. To the extent that some of them might, they’re only hostile to what they are entering, hoping to “islamise” or “decolonise” it through their own dyscivilisational tendencies.

The sad part is that it doesn’t have to be this way. In point of fact, the West is hobbling itself. The situation which now exists is totally, completely an unforced error. A combination of being overcivilised, suffering from “white guilt,” and allowing progressives to wield power has led to this.

The obvious answer is to stop doing the things that are causing the West to hamstring itself. The White, western man needs to regain some of that “incivility” that he used to have which made him master of the world. In essence, the Saxon needs to learn to hate once more. Keep in mind that there’s nothing keeping us from simply removing these people by one means or another except for our own scruples. Yes, they may try to riot, may try the route of violence, but never forget that Whites are the single most capable people on this planet at organising themselves and engaging in organised violence. If the masses of third worlders cannot reconcile themselves to a reassertion of western sovereignty within our own nations, then they should be rendered unable to resist it and we should be confident in the understanding that they created the situation in which we can do so with absolute moral certainty.

Our peoples need to stop suffering from White guilt. The testimony of history says that Whites, in many ways, were far better in how they conducted themselves on the world stage and certainly were not nearly as bad as many peoples and individual actors across the span of human history. We were simply better at asserting ourselves due to our intelligence, drive, and capacity to create. For that, we should not apologise, and we certainly should not hold any misplaced feelings of guilt that would continue to cause us to allow the migrants to destroy our societies.

Lastly, we need to fully internalise the fact that if the West is to both continue and continue to be a bastion of high civilisation, the Left will need to be crushed. So-called “progressives” must be displaced from power in whatever fashion this can be achieved and must be kept from ever regaining it. Leftists are the enemies of all that is good and right, they invariably tend toward disunity, disorder, and dyscivilisation. Removing their pets from our premises is certainly needful, but the longer-term problem remains for so long as progressivism is allowed to flourish (or even exist). In all these cases, western nations will need to make some difficult choices, but the sooner this done, the better.