Absolutely correct. If the hirelings we hire to enforce our laws (cops, prosecutors, judges) refuse the authority we delegate to them to keep our streets & families safe, the non-delegable responsibility to do so remains ours. It’s called “self-government.” WE are responsible for OUR society. Bad guys still need killing even when our hirelings put them back on the streets.
Here’s some things I’d like to know what you think in relation to this:
In a Gynocracy / Longhouse:
- There’s no room for violence only smothering ‘niceness’.
- Weakness is celebrated and strength in any form is discouraged.
- The avoidance of Pain is one of the highest goods (connected to Safetyism).
- There’s no need for consequences, because we can just learn everything by sitting and listening to people talk about ideas and theories.
Drukpa once said on Twitter that in India, police sometimes need to use canes.
He said that since some people don’t think in abstract ways, they can’t feel shame, but they do understand pain because it’s sensory.
Ed Dutton also has a theory that War may serve as a way to keep mutational load down since we are Apex predators and nothing else regulates or limits us.
Wherever you live, wherever you are from, (unless it is Russia or China) expect a call from the police, probably at 5 am to 'discuss' your column and probably with a nice little psychiatrist along you adjust your attitude and belief system.
I have been banned from several columns for advocating a return to 'chivalry' and being willing to defend myself and those around with force.
So far merely the obvious willingness to use force has kept us safe for the last 40 years.
We are now ruled by women's feelings, and this is leading to economic decline, mass death by vaxx and abortion, and ultimately the end of civilization.
This is true. The Court system in the Yookay is a mess of female pandering to a criminal class that recognises how to play the system. Appropriate punishment plays a distant second fiddle to “compassionate concern” for the “needs” of the criminal.
In 2021, among doctors injecting kids, there was a dearth of broken arms, and among teachers imposing masks and social distancing, a dearth of shaven heads. This was due to a dearth of menfolk combining together.
If the first people to wear masks had had them ripped from their faces, the farce would have been over very quickly. But that would have been impolite, violent even, wouldn't it?
Judges are a law unto themselves. It is they who are betraying us.
Given as things in most jurisdictions are constituted today, a judge who exhibits bad judgement risks at most not being promoted.
The ultimate check & balance afforded by any electoral democracy worth the name is the option of deselection of public figures, including not only judges but also public prosecutors and some more.
There would seem to be an enormous number of judges of worthless character. De-selecting them in a national vote would overwhelm the citizenry and become burdensome. Those identified as suspect (which leaves many of mediocre and a few of sound character) would, for continued appointment, have to appeal to a popular vote in their area of residence. To this end, information on their judgement calls would have to be available to all.
The turnout is irrelevant. If of a score of voters, a dozen vote for deselection, the judge is deselected. Lucky to retain their pension. ________
There could be a personal invitation to judges to affirm their approval of the above procedure or else to propose an alternative. An alternative might be that they be assessed on their discernment, competence and common decency by professionals from outside the legal sphere.
Those failing to respond, or to respond in a conciliatory manner, should be listed publicly so that all know. It would be wishful thinking to demand their home address and photographs.
I must responds that, if this were true, Rittenhouse and Penne/Perry (Catholic european master race, I am sorry guys) trials and Soros' DA would not be necessary.
Violence in service of political liars and billionaires has been highly glorified, while violence to maintain the peace and safety of our families, communities, culture and society has been vehemently vilified.
I desperately wish it were so, but I have lost all faith. Just waiting for the day when I will be stabbed for politely informing foreigners that they are sitting in the silent wagon of the train. The impotently grateful eyes of my fellow Norwegian passengers do not leave me with much hope, and this is absolutely NOTHING compared to what it would take to actually make a difference. The same drives that civilized us, make us stand with our hands at our sides while a bioweapon nukes all the screens at the airport with a hammer.
I think you are right. Decent people will not tolerate what is going on under so-called democratic western governments for much longer and there will be a backlash. But I would also point out that governments have also in many cases acted to create an illusion of violence and have opened borders to allow the influx of violent elements, so they have helped to manufacture a situation of a threat in order to introduce more extreme forms of social control to suit their own agendas. This has been a strategy for over seventy years, throughout the Cold War and beyond into the present day. It is called ‘The strategy of tension’ and was born in the immediate period following the end of WWII with operation Gladio. At that time anyone who supported left-wing ideas (communism) was a threat to stability in Europe. There followed for a period of forty years or so a series of bombings and assassinations mainly in Italy but also in other European countries always blamed on ‘the left’ but in fact carried out by secret ‘stay-behind’ armies comprising nazi groups recruited by the CIA and NATO. You can read about this on my Substack. This operation is acknowledged to have occurred but it is clear that the same kind of operations are going on today, only the ‘culprit’ has changed and we now have ‘Muslim extremists’. Many of the events which are said to have been perpetrated by such actors do not hold up under close scrutiny. Here I am speaking of for example 9-11, but also in the U.K., the 2005 London tube and bus bombings, the Manchester Arena 2017 ‘suicide bombing’. These, and other similar ‘atrocities were staged by deep state actors. The same may well be true of recent attacks in Germany (I think you mentioned the Christmas market attacks).
I don’t think this can be said of the ‘grooming gangs’ in the U.K. but the authorities certainly turned a blind eye to this for years and are very obviously complicit. So what I am saying is that ‘the rot’ lies very much within. It is not an external foreign enemy as such but our very own governments who are corrupted and control mad and will do anything even going as far as killing their own citizens to achieve political and ideological goals.
I think you can see this in some ways in the differences between different parts of the US. In some areas, thugs walk the line because they know they'll get braced and thrown in jail, or lit up by armed citizens. In other areas they strut around, abusing people.
And, yes, the gender angle on all this mindset is sadly quite valid. Avoid areas where the managerial gynocracy is in power.
A very important distinction between chivalry and manners, with the latter ultimately depending on the former to exist. Feminized oversocialization cannot survive on a frontier; you need conquest before you can have decadence, the longship before the longhouse.
Also, your reference to idiotic zero tolerance policies gave me a nasty flashback. I've been out of high school for awhile, but even back then, such cancer was commonplace.
Every system currently active exists to ensure that citizens do not use violence, lest the state ceases to function, no matter how badly it runs. Fear of retribution and of people actively acting in self-defence would automatically disempower the leftist nonsensocracy, hence why the longhouse hectoring, and the fake panoc over "Adolescence", which in reality is just agitprop.
Absolutely correct. If the hirelings we hire to enforce our laws (cops, prosecutors, judges) refuse the authority we delegate to them to keep our streets & families safe, the non-delegable responsibility to do so remains ours. It’s called “self-government.” WE are responsible for OUR society. Bad guys still need killing even when our hirelings put them back on the streets.
There's a reason private security in South Africa is twice the size of the police and armed forces combined.
Excellent read!
I hope you continue to write on this topic.
Here’s some things I’d like to know what you think in relation to this:
In a Gynocracy / Longhouse:
- There’s no room for violence only smothering ‘niceness’.
- Weakness is celebrated and strength in any form is discouraged.
- The avoidance of Pain is one of the highest goods (connected to Safetyism).
- There’s no need for consequences, because we can just learn everything by sitting and listening to people talk about ideas and theories.
Drukpa once said on Twitter that in India, police sometimes need to use canes.
He said that since some people don’t think in abstract ways, they can’t feel shame, but they do understand pain because it’s sensory.
Ed Dutton also has a theory that War may serve as a way to keep mutational load down since we are Apex predators and nothing else regulates or limits us.
Love that term Gynocracy - that could be a prequel to Mike Judge's Idiocracy.
Yes! I heard it on Lotus Eaters and like the menacing quality it has.
Uhhoh, now you have done it.
Wherever you live, wherever you are from, (unless it is Russia or China) expect a call from the police, probably at 5 am to 'discuss' your column and probably with a nice little psychiatrist along you adjust your attitude and belief system.
I have been banned from several columns for advocating a return to 'chivalry' and being willing to defend myself and those around with force.
So far merely the obvious willingness to use force has kept us safe for the last 40 years.
The problem is the matriarchy.
We are now ruled by women's feelings, and this is leading to economic decline, mass death by vaxx and abortion, and ultimately the end of civilization.
This is true. The Court system in the Yookay is a mess of female pandering to a criminal class that recognises how to play the system. Appropriate punishment plays a distant second fiddle to “compassionate concern” for the “needs” of the criminal.
In 2021, among doctors injecting kids, there was a dearth of broken arms, and among teachers imposing masks and social distancing, a dearth of shaven heads. This was due to a dearth of menfolk combining together.
If the first people to wear masks had had them ripped from their faces, the farce would have been over very quickly. But that would have been impolite, violent even, wouldn't it?
Judges are a law unto themselves. It is they who are betraying us.
Given as things in most jurisdictions are constituted today, a judge who exhibits bad judgement risks at most not being promoted.
The ultimate check & balance afforded by any electoral democracy worth the name is the option of deselection of public figures, including not only judges but also public prosecutors and some more.
There would seem to be an enormous number of judges of worthless character. De-selecting them in a national vote would overwhelm the citizenry and become burdensome. Those identified as suspect (which leaves many of mediocre and a few of sound character) would, for continued appointment, have to appeal to a popular vote in their area of residence. To this end, information on their judgement calls would have to be available to all.
The turnout is irrelevant. If of a score of voters, a dozen vote for deselection, the judge is deselected. Lucky to retain their pension. ________
There could be a personal invitation to judges to affirm their approval of the above procedure or else to propose an alternative. An alternative might be that they be assessed on their discernment, competence and common decency by professionals from outside the legal sphere.
Those failing to respond, or to respond in a conciliatory manner, should be listed publicly so that all know. It would be wishful thinking to demand their home address and photographs.
http://www.fuzzydemocracy.eu/fzyenglish/Juries.html
I must responds that, if this were true, Rittenhouse and Penne/Perry (Catholic european master race, I am sorry guys) trials and Soros' DA would not be necessary.
I carry everyday. My commitment to civilization.
Violence in service of political liars and billionaires has been highly glorified, while violence to maintain the peace and safety of our families, communities, culture and society has been vehemently vilified.
Bravo!
I desperately wish it were so, but I have lost all faith. Just waiting for the day when I will be stabbed for politely informing foreigners that they are sitting in the silent wagon of the train. The impotently grateful eyes of my fellow Norwegian passengers do not leave me with much hope, and this is absolutely NOTHING compared to what it would take to actually make a difference. The same drives that civilized us, make us stand with our hands at our sides while a bioweapon nukes all the screens at the airport with a hammer.
I think you are right. Decent people will not tolerate what is going on under so-called democratic western governments for much longer and there will be a backlash. But I would also point out that governments have also in many cases acted to create an illusion of violence and have opened borders to allow the influx of violent elements, so they have helped to manufacture a situation of a threat in order to introduce more extreme forms of social control to suit their own agendas. This has been a strategy for over seventy years, throughout the Cold War and beyond into the present day. It is called ‘The strategy of tension’ and was born in the immediate period following the end of WWII with operation Gladio. At that time anyone who supported left-wing ideas (communism) was a threat to stability in Europe. There followed for a period of forty years or so a series of bombings and assassinations mainly in Italy but also in other European countries always blamed on ‘the left’ but in fact carried out by secret ‘stay-behind’ armies comprising nazi groups recruited by the CIA and NATO. You can read about this on my Substack. This operation is acknowledged to have occurred but it is clear that the same kind of operations are going on today, only the ‘culprit’ has changed and we now have ‘Muslim extremists’. Many of the events which are said to have been perpetrated by such actors do not hold up under close scrutiny. Here I am speaking of for example 9-11, but also in the U.K., the 2005 London tube and bus bombings, the Manchester Arena 2017 ‘suicide bombing’. These, and other similar ‘atrocities were staged by deep state actors. The same may well be true of recent attacks in Germany (I think you mentioned the Christmas market attacks).
I don’t think this can be said of the ‘grooming gangs’ in the U.K. but the authorities certainly turned a blind eye to this for years and are very obviously complicit. So what I am saying is that ‘the rot’ lies very much within. It is not an external foreign enemy as such but our very own governments who are corrupted and control mad and will do anything even going as far as killing their own citizens to achieve political and ideological goals.
I think you can see this in some ways in the differences between different parts of the US. In some areas, thugs walk the line because they know they'll get braced and thrown in jail, or lit up by armed citizens. In other areas they strut around, abusing people.
And, yes, the gender angle on all this mindset is sadly quite valid. Avoid areas where the managerial gynocracy is in power.
This was excellent. I'd like to have you consider this: you use violence to attack, but force to defend.
That is distinction truly answers the HR State wordsmiths arguments. Regardless, punch fucking hard.
A punch in time saves nine.
A very important distinction between chivalry and manners, with the latter ultimately depending on the former to exist. Feminized oversocialization cannot survive on a frontier; you need conquest before you can have decadence, the longship before the longhouse.
Also, your reference to idiotic zero tolerance policies gave me a nasty flashback. I've been out of high school for awhile, but even back then, such cancer was commonplace.
Every system currently active exists to ensure that citizens do not use violence, lest the state ceases to function, no matter how badly it runs. Fear of retribution and of people actively acting in self-defence would automatically disempower the leftist nonsensocracy, hence why the longhouse hectoring, and the fake panoc over "Adolescence", which in reality is just agitprop.