26 Comments

Well said. Clarifying. I have long talked of American Imperialism, but it is indeed global now, and it is increasingly unelected. No one voted for the WEF and adjacent. If they mean to rule the can only be usurpers and by def illegitimate.

Expand full comment
Oct 1, 2022·edited Oct 1, 2022Liked by Theophilus Chilton

The WEF are not rulers...they are merely event managers, entertainers and talent scouts for clown world.

The planetary archons or rulers are distributed throughput national and international organisations. IMHO the best way to identify them is by a simple test: do they routinely dismiss demands for granting priority to local people or causes over global or foreign ones? By their fruits...

Expand full comment

The WEF is a primary hub around which the globalist trans elite constellate.

Expand full comment

The WEF gets plenty of press but the real connections are forged by economic and social convergence and the expectation of personal gain to be had from collaboration. IMO Davos is useful as an occasional focus of attention, but it will age-out quickly enough and get replaced with something new soon enough.

Expand full comment

I look at the WEF as the face of a monster whose body we can't quite see. That public-presenting face will likely shift at some point, but over the last few years, the motivations of the invisible monster appear to match the words and expressions of the face. I'm almost grateful for the overt messaging of intentions. almost...

Expand full comment

That's a good way of looking at it. However, I am personally disturbed by the frequency with which they announce their intentions and the lack of any response. They clearly anticipate no effective resistance and are proven right every time.

Expand full comment
Oct 1, 2022Liked by Theophilus Chilton

There was never anything American about "American" imperialism. Yocky spelled it out in Imperium.

Expand full comment
Oct 1, 2022Liked by Theophilus Chilton

Dave, respectfully disagree. The imperial project incorporated both indigenous and other sources from the very beginning in the very early 20th c. and the relationship between the two was dynamic and fast-evolving. It assimilated political forces from across the ideological, political and ethnic spectrum. In Yockey's time the establishment of the American empire by the New Deal brought together the Left and Right, including any number of people who had once been fellow-travellers of either Moscow or Berlin. Imperialism (especially on a global scale) requires a fair degree of inclusion to succeed, it also requires the transformation of political identities and loyalties over time.

Of course, it is ultimately a matter of perspective, labelling and hindsight. The perspective of UK patriots like Enoch Powell (who was consistently anti-American) and British Empire Loyalists or of Gaullists was very different from someone like Yocky.

Expand full comment

Yocky wrote compelling about the roots of US imperialism going back before Wilson, but I digress. More importantly he named who was behind said urge.

The point is moot IMO, as it looks like the guilty parties are about to have the curtain yanked back, pulled down, and burned.

Expand full comment

It will be instructive who gets the blame for the catastrophes into which we are heading. My best guess is that responsibility will be apportioned according to the principle of expedience. The utility of an aging, discredited, gerontocracy supported by revolting and mediocre opportunists is that there is an abundance of potential candidates to be sacrificed when the time comes. When that happens key portions of the various guilty parties will remake themselves somehow. CVs will be rewritten, files lost, photographs airbrushed. Professional historians will be brought in to ensure that the record is corrected in the best traditions of academic fashion.

Expand full comment

I'm not so sure it's going to be that easy for them this time. Just to illustrate how stupid they are, they assumed they could use the Internet into a system of information control, and yet here we are, two strangers discussing what's likely to happen to them...

Expand full comment

Dave, you are perfectly right...it will not be easy...either for them or for us. The number of known and unknown variables is daunting. The ease with which information and opinion can be communicated is extraordinary, but we have no relevant experience how the net will function, if it functions at all, in a war or a catastrophic crisis. My guess is that the system will be shut-down, either in a false-flag disruption targeting signals infrastructure or simply by a structured denial of service applied by key corporations. Do not forget, Leviathan has ample resources to plan or war-game such scenarios and while people fronting the clown show are indeed fools (and in many cases much worse than that) do not underestimate the discrete types who occupy key executive positions in the critical institutions. These are not geniuses, but they are smart enough to manage the mechanisms of control and repression.

Furthermore, we are in uncharted waters as far as the population goes. A significant minority are under-socialised or defectively socialised, a surprisingly great many suffer behavioural problems brought on by chronic sleep deprivation and cannabis ingestion. The structures that enabled purposeful action in the past (families, congregations and unions) are not what they were. Mass psychology in the 20th c. was bad enough...the 21st might see worse.

Whatever happens to them (the elites), the important thing is the endless task of maintaining one's spiritual and intellectual integrity. Provided enough of us succeed in this, things will work out well enough in the end and we will rebuild. Our ancestors fought off cave bears to find a place to shelter...we, by contrast, are merely facing buffoons who are enchanted by Netflix, who get their understanding of statecraft from HOUSE OF CARDS and of valour from movies based on comic books.

Expand full comment
Oct 1, 2022·edited Oct 1, 2022Liked by Theophilus Chilton

Theophilus, outstanding: timely, precise and unsentimental.

The distinction between the New Empire Loyalists and the the deplorables, chuds or hillbillies the world over forms the critical social and political line of fracture in every corner of the globe. The distributed nature of imperial power ensures that there is support for global integration when and where it is needed. It also endures that there is support for resistance too. Should the empire contract or the centre of power and decision-making shift, the regime will remain viable.

The challenge for Americans, as I see it, is how to forge meaningful cohesion across the spectrum of the legacy population and adjacent or compatible populations. Class compromise is essential. In the UK the retardation of English national thinking/feeling has been an ongoing priority with the Establishment for many generations, even centuries. And the Establishment has been inordinately successful at this.

Expand full comment

While I, until recently, held to this 'transnational empire' idea - and its presumed 'otherness' from the USA - I can no longer do so with a straight face.

The USA is, beyond any doubt, the central core of this 'globalist' cabal. All other entities are merely sectors designed as control units in the international sphere. Take away the USA - its thuggish military, its Wall Street chicanery, its heart of globalism in Washington DC itself - there would be no controlling 'globalist' power to be seen.

Also, the people of the US cannot be held unaccountable for this arrogant root of international manipulation either. They continue to turn a blind eye to all of the arrogant offenses to peoples of other States - and, more often than not, even support these insults with maddening enthusiasm.

It's insinuated that people of the US are beginning to disapprove of this policy of international bullying, but are they really? Where is the protest - outside of the usual online social network whining and crying. The people of the US care nothing about their responsibilities in the world at large. They only care for themselves - that's why 'inflation', 'gas prices', 'abortion', etc, are the main topics during this election period.

Nowhere is the core of these problems even addressed - the unconditional support of the US/NATO instigated Ukraine/Russian conflict. Where are the protests when the US govt. hands over to Ukraine millions of dollars of the people's wealth every other week? They don't protest this because they support it...they are complicit.

No - this denial of the USA as the core of globalist internationalism is as blind as can be expected by apologists who refuse to see the reality. Putin laid that out in his September 30 speech at the Kremlin. And while I'm not so naive as to believe his intentions are completely benign, I cannot help but be impressed with his clarity of vision regarding what is truly occurring in this international conflict of our time.

It would be good to listen to what he had to say: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciP3iWAxFqY

Expand full comment

A Visitor >. But given the destruction of the Nord2 stream and the destruction of Eropean economies, the FEDs open war on the European banksters and as you say " People of USA care nothing about their responsibilies to the world at large" >>how can we really be sure that the Zionist cabal is really organised and run from USA.

Expand full comment

I'm not sure that I understand your question.

There's clearly a new opposition rising that's quickly becoming a serious challenge to the 'globalist' hegemony - the hegemony that's dominated the world's economic/financial spheres since mid-20th century. That 'globalist' hegemony is, and has been, enforced and propped up via US military power - as well as its financial base.

This new Eurasian economic system is also having a telling effect politically - States that have been manipulated and abused by the 'globalist' hegemony are seeking inclusion in the multipolar scheme.

The challenges you mention are all a result of the ridiculously absurd attempt by the Western globalists to marginalize Russia - it's backfiring. The globalists are losing the grip.

The simple answer regarding the zionists: follow the money, follow the control, follow the military might. Israel itself wouldn't even exist right now, for instance, if the US government - as well as the taxpayers - didn't prop it up since its inception. This is pretty much a no-brainer, actually.

Expand full comment

Yes, that's the way I see it. A recent speech by Putin also spells this out but he never mentions Israel or Zionism, I imagine the evil of the day he has to face is enough without inviting more sneering insanity from the west

E

Expand full comment

Because the zionists and the Western globalists are so intimately linked to each other, it seems pretty clear that with the collapse of the West - economically/socially/politically - israel will have to face some very hard choices as well.

The Middle East States are also seeing the advantage of aligning with the multipolar system. China and Russia are creating alliances in the region that will no doubt reshape the political situation in a way not imagined during the last century.

It's interesting that israel has decided not to send material/military aid to Ukraine - as suggested by the US. Perhaps israel's not happy about the new US multi-billion dollar pet project - their free ride will no doubt be affected by the faltering US economy and its out-of-control deficit spending. Nor are they happy about the changing alliances of the Middle East States and its assertion of the power behind the resources.

The zionists are predominantly jews - and throughout history, the jews have always shifted towards greener pastures when the host no longer offered them an advantage. Don't be surprised if the rats decide to jump the ship. And if they do, their choices in dealing with, say, the Palestinians will have to adjust to the new reality. The greater danger in all of this is the Sampson Option.

Thinking leaders like Putin are focused on the greater view. Israel - without the US - really isn't so relevant in that regard. It lacks any resources to offer. It lacks any industrial base. All of its technology is appropriated from its Western allies. To thinkers like Putin, there's other more pressing issues to attend to. In a way, israel is being treated like the two-bit snake in the grass that it is - its annoying, but its hardly worth mentioning in a plan that affects the whole garden.

Or so this seems to me...*grinz*

Expand full comment

Go back prior to WW1. That Empire begat Cecil Rhodes and the Rhodes Roundtables and the vision for an English speaking global Empire. While the new Transnational Empire is not exactly ruled by the Windsors the City of London and Wall Street do rule through their client states and the language of this Empire is English, not French German or Dutch or Spanish or even as yet Mandarin. Soon though it will be Mandarin. The rise of China is encouraged and welcomed by the Empire for reasons which are not entirely clear.

Expand full comment

Because assuming Z1on is in charge as it is, and has no scruples or soul, as it doesn't, why not side with China to destroy USA while creating a new Israel i in Ukraine Z1onsim is a monster and will deal with china in ts own good time. .

Expand full comment

Great piece. Never shill my shit in comments but 2nd half of this dovetails closely enough to justify it https://harrybergeron.substack.com/p/the-militarized-network-state

Expand full comment

The concision of your brilliant definition of "Christian nationalism" is useful as we trolls and readers go forth to do battle in the trenches of the internet....

Expand full comment

All of this has already been written in a book called Global Trap in 1996. It's not mistake but design of the system which uses financialization, outsourcing and lowering cost by exporting its industry and workforce to third-countries. I don't think there is some conspiracy, it's truly just a consequence of all of this process's designed to lower the costs and use cheap labor from other countries.

The result is rich immigration which provides cheap labor, then this cheap labor becoming increasingly more powerful than local population due to ambition, technology, internet and no moral or historical barriers - immigrants are willing to work more for less and also to peruse goals which their more smart people seem as dangerous or impossible. Then they need just to make some system to empower this "nitwits", grab power and hold it before this trend it reversed. That's what happened the last two years.

So yes, it's the fall of the empire and most of these tools has been advanced and advocated by America. They allowed and also benefited mostly from this. What we observe now is push to get rid of this and get back to empower local population instead of the immigration workers. And it's already in full swing and I feel, it will succeed.

More about the book here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Global_Trap

Expand full comment

Truly optimistic but people have shown how damned stupid we are over the Covid hoax. I wouldn't bet on the populace achieving anything at all. ever. .

Expand full comment

I really like the term "The Regime". On par with the language of Orwell, yet more abstract, and conveys how undefinable the powerful truly are in our modern society. Great post, thank you.

Expand full comment