This is how one thinks when one is divorced from reality.
I live in the contemporary reality. In this case north Australia, where governments introduced housing, civil serices, and western products became available, both good and bad. I observed the reaction in its entirety, part of that representing government and documenting the process.
What went wrong, and in fact continues to go wrong, is that ignorant white people fail to comprehend their own culture and, for example, provide houses but do not teach people how to live healthily in these, or provide employment but fail to explain the rationale behind the employment/remuneration process. Addressing the latter, the 300 year industrial revolution transitioned us from landless serfs to paid workers, but a trade is thus established. We apply for the job, become employed, turn up on the job site, expend our energy for several hours and, in return for that labour, get paid a reasonable but (union) regulated remuneration portion of gross productivity (from which the cost of site rent, administration costs, transport costs, taxes, and so on, have already been deducted by our accountant). If the quality of our labour is unprofitable, we get sacked.
When this process was introduced, supervisors and planners failed to understand that this full continuity must be explained to people who have not been conditioned by the 300 year transition. Thus, Aborigines in traditional communities aspire to and apply for jobs, get selected, and turn up in the prescribed work site. As with one woman, she immediately curls up and goes to sleep. Productivity is sometimes zilch. White supervisors mutter about lazy blackfellers, not realising they have failed to recognise the cross-cultural situation. They have failed to mention the trade-off of personal energy for money.
In the broader community, there is an expectation of goods, services, and rights, that are entirely divorced from the transactional reality, thus creating a cargo cult. Clearly, the fault is white stupidity and incomptence, not endemic indigenous sub-inteligence as so many Europeans believe.
I have tried to explain this to governments for fifty years and until a few months ago, failed to encounter a single European in authority who has sufficient intelligence to grasp the message. Ergo, cargo cult is created by European ignorance, ethnocentricity, and appalling ignorance. As we speak, Europe as disintegrating for this very reason., never to recover. And I say, good riddance. But Americans will have little time to gloat because the same blindness to reality is destroying the US.
Cue the institutional care for parentless children.
The same dynamic you describe—on lesser scale yet no less instructive—has been going on unnoticed under our very noses for decades. These poor kids are 'socialised' into thinking the state *must* provide for them, for it's what it always does. An inalienable right is internalised, the right to leech off of societal resources that somehow are owed to them for the mere 'presence of warm bodies' 🤷
ETA I tried to reason with a graduate once: a lost cause, might as well have been speaking to an alien 😢
Not at all...they prefer the majority undersocialised or maladjusted (preferably by single parent households). That way they become clients of the system but blame does not get attributed to any institution (thereby attracting financial liabilities for compensation for abuse/neglect).
I am not sure that those in authority do not understand. There are tons who do, but they need to remain silent for fear of career retribution. The enforcers of ideological conformism are ruthless and energetic. Once heard of a whistleblower who was rung up by chief of staff of the minister and told: you pull a stunt like that again and you will never work again. She took sick leave, updated her cv and got out ASAP.
I have friends who have worked in remote communities who understand. Also know people who theoretically manage/supervise indigenous staff who certainly do. One of the latter once sought advice from someone right at the top on what to do with cases of chronic absenteeism involving subordinates who showed up to work about once a fortnight to read their emails. He was told directly: leave or shut up and pretend everything is OK. There is no middle ground.
A friend once put together a case against people responsible for fraud that is relevant here: the head of the fraud squad in the relevant department told him that there was no way they would take it any further. They are not paid to cause headaches for those in charge.
Have personal experience too. Once worked in an indigenous unit for six months in the wake of 'deaths in custody' royal commission. Helped audit programmes in the era before the National Audit Office. It was demoralising beyond words.
Of course there are plenty of true believers at the top too. They just lap it all up.
The big picture is simple: it is a protection racket. Pay up or we delegitimise the system with protests nationally and internationally.
Clearly, Phillip, you are no newcomer to this. But it is remotely possible we are approaching the corner. The Voice controversy is forcing people to think, in terrain they have never previously explored. Typically, they cast around at the range of opinions splattering out there in the media and consider those they intuit towards. I hope to exploit this sudden explosion of practical and ideological possibilities but, of course, the MSM does not like this. One can only try. I am hopeful that a meeting with the Governor General later this year, at his request, may open a few doors. A related request for documentation from Australian National University is another, but I suspect this is WEF academia. My substack, oziz4oziz is another. As with fishing, I like to use a wide net. But on the home front, a couple of Aboriginal law authorities are furious with me because I recorded their incompetence and abuse of the system, which short-sighted and easily manipulated white people have unwittingly cultivated by making excuses for decades. I have blasted them for this and they have recognised the truth. It's all a matter of breaking the nexus (if that is the corret term). Anyway, Phillip, keep in touch because I am certain this is the road forward.
This is how one thinks when one is divorced from reality.
I live in the contemporary reality. In this case north Australia, where governments introduced housing, civil serices, and western products became available, both good and bad. I observed the reaction in its entirety, part of that representing government and documenting the process.
What went wrong, and in fact continues to go wrong, is that ignorant white people fail to comprehend their own culture and, for example, provide houses but do not teach people how to live healthily in these, or provide employment but fail to explain the rationale behind the employment/remuneration process. Addressing the latter, the 300 year industrial revolution transitioned us from landless serfs to paid workers, but a trade is thus established. We apply for the job, become employed, turn up on the job site, expend our energy for several hours and, in return for that labour, get paid a reasonable but (union) regulated remuneration portion of gross productivity (from which the cost of site rent, administration costs, transport costs, taxes, and so on, have already been deducted by our accountant). If the quality of our labour is unprofitable, we get sacked.
When this process was introduced, supervisors and planners failed to understand that this full continuity must be explained to people who have not been conditioned by the 300 year transition. Thus, Aborigines in traditional communities aspire to and apply for jobs, get selected, and turn up in the prescribed work site. As with one woman, she immediately curls up and goes to sleep. Productivity is sometimes zilch. White supervisors mutter about lazy blackfellers, not realising they have failed to recognise the cross-cultural situation. They have failed to mention the trade-off of personal energy for money.
In the broader community, there is an expectation of goods, services, and rights, that are entirely divorced from the transactional reality, thus creating a cargo cult. Clearly, the fault is white stupidity and incomptence, not endemic indigenous sub-inteligence as so many Europeans believe.
I have tried to explain this to governments for fifty years and until a few months ago, failed to encounter a single European in authority who has sufficient intelligence to grasp the message. Ergo, cargo cult is created by European ignorance, ethnocentricity, and appalling ignorance. As we speak, Europe as disintegrating for this very reason., never to recover. And I say, good riddance. But Americans will have little time to gloat because the same blindness to reality is destroying the US.
Cue the institutional care for parentless children.
The same dynamic you describe—on lesser scale yet no less instructive—has been going on unnoticed under our very noses for decades. These poor kids are 'socialised' into thinking the state *must* provide for them, for it's what it always does. An inalienable right is internalised, the right to leech off of societal resources that somehow are owed to them for the mere 'presence of warm bodies' 🤷
ETA I tried to reason with a graduate once: a lost cause, might as well have been speaking to an alien 😢
if the globalists had their way, every child would be state-raised.
Not at all...they prefer the majority undersocialised or maladjusted (preferably by single parent households). That way they become clients of the system but blame does not get attributed to any institution (thereby attracting financial liabilities for compensation for abuse/neglect).
I am not sure that those in authority do not understand. There are tons who do, but they need to remain silent for fear of career retribution. The enforcers of ideological conformism are ruthless and energetic. Once heard of a whistleblower who was rung up by chief of staff of the minister and told: you pull a stunt like that again and you will never work again. She took sick leave, updated her cv and got out ASAP.
I have friends who have worked in remote communities who understand. Also know people who theoretically manage/supervise indigenous staff who certainly do. One of the latter once sought advice from someone right at the top on what to do with cases of chronic absenteeism involving subordinates who showed up to work about once a fortnight to read their emails. He was told directly: leave or shut up and pretend everything is OK. There is no middle ground.
A friend once put together a case against people responsible for fraud that is relevant here: the head of the fraud squad in the relevant department told him that there was no way they would take it any further. They are not paid to cause headaches for those in charge.
Have personal experience too. Once worked in an indigenous unit for six months in the wake of 'deaths in custody' royal commission. Helped audit programmes in the era before the National Audit Office. It was demoralising beyond words.
Of course there are plenty of true believers at the top too. They just lap it all up.
The big picture is simple: it is a protection racket. Pay up or we delegitimise the system with protests nationally and internationally.
Clearly, Phillip, you are no newcomer to this. But it is remotely possible we are approaching the corner. The Voice controversy is forcing people to think, in terrain they have never previously explored. Typically, they cast around at the range of opinions splattering out there in the media and consider those they intuit towards. I hope to exploit this sudden explosion of practical and ideological possibilities but, of course, the MSM does not like this. One can only try. I am hopeful that a meeting with the Governor General later this year, at his request, may open a few doors. A related request for documentation from Australian National University is another, but I suspect this is WEF academia. My substack, oziz4oziz is another. As with fishing, I like to use a wide net. But on the home front, a couple of Aboriginal law authorities are furious with me because I recorded their incompetence and abuse of the system, which short-sighted and easily manipulated white people have unwittingly cultivated by making excuses for decades. I have blasted them for this and they have recognised the truth. It's all a matter of breaking the nexus (if that is the corret term). Anyway, Phillip, keep in touch because I am certain this is the road forward.