What kind of ruling elite seeks to destabilize and destroy the very society over which it rules? It's almost as if our ruling elite have their own homeland, separate and apart from our country, to which they plan to escape if their gambit backfires and things get bad enough for them. Very strange! 🤔
Annus Mirablis ! Pinch faced little ninnies out, organizing in !
"Ironically, the one thing that has done “the Feds” job more than anything else has been the division-sowing by the pinched-faced little ninnies who always label any call to action as the work of “Feds,” no matter how innocuous and scrupulously legal it may be."
It's true that some mass shootings indeed look strange. I forget the name of that one school shooting after which one of the students exploited it to get money through politics. But I remember that there were tons of warnings about that shooter being violent and about to do something, and they ignored it. This in a country where a little kid was sent home from school for biting his pop-tart into the shape of a gun.
In Britain, just a week before the EU referendum, a mentally ill man shot a Labour politician and her Muslim aide. This made the pro-independence side cancel their campaigning for several days, because apparently they had to atone for being pro-independent. How odd that something like that has NEVER happened in Britain either before or after. Only right before the most crucial vote.
However, regarding ISIS, they are obviously not a U.S. agent. In that case the U.S. wouldn't have been bombing them in Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan. In Afghanistan, the U.S. quietly functioned as the Talibans' air force against ISIS in one region.
But Washington did approve of Qatar and Saudi Arabia funding those who became ISIS. Washington approved of Turkey letting in their recruits across the border, and said nothing about Erdogan's son buying oil from ISIS and shipping it off (to some unknown country, but I'm guessing Israel). Washington sanctioned Syria even when the rebels were clearly dominated by al-Qaeda and ISIS, and Washington gave guns to front troops on the border which they knew were selling or giving the guns to ISIS and al-Q, who most of them later joined.
But they didn't control ISIS and did want them gone eventually, instead helping the Kurds take their territory. But this is too much nuance for some people. Just like those who go rah-rah for anything Washington does, "our side," so there are those who think anyone Washington is against must be defended. In both cases it's about being too lazy and simply too d... un-unintelligent to grasp nuance.
It especially sickens me to see people defend the tyrant Khadaffi. Those who do so know nothing. "He wanted an African currency so that's why they wanted him gone!" LOL First of all no one cared about his fantasies. Second, this supposed "pan-African" took Libya's college kids, gave them two months of training, and sent them to invade Chad. For some war glory. It was a disaster and only a competent Libyan general prevented Chad's soldiers from following them back to Libya. Khadaffi also had his guards kidnap little girls across the country, and women from France, which he kept as sex slaves in the basement under his palace. They never got to see the sun. He beat them, urinated on them and killed many of them. Those he didn't kill when he tired of them were beaten bloody and left in ditches or parking lots. Khadaffi also armed Blacks from Mali and elsewhere to control the people.
Or they'll defend the de facto dictator Ortega in Nicaragua because Biden criticized his sham election, so he must be good. Ortega is a leftist, but even other Central Asian leftist presidents condemned him, as well as the social democrats in Spain. He banned and arrested opposition leaders before the election and forbade them from campaigning, and controlled the election completely. If he ever left office and presidential immunity he'd be tried for the disappearence of hundreds of student protesters years back, so he clings on. BUT, if WASHINGTON criticized him, he must be defended.
But I digress.
Those who say "ISIS was a U.S. agent" or who defend Khadaffi and people like him, because Washington must be the only bad actor in existence, never know anything about these groups or people aside from on a tabloid level.
Kurt Schlichter wrote a plausible novel about a team based strike like this in “The Attack.” It’s given me a lot to think about with my locality, my power plant, my role as a volunteer firefighter, an armed citizen and a head of a household.
As the intersection of the container ship with the supports in Baltimore illustrates, we have even more to watch out for than villains at our doors. The East Coast marine military force sits within a coastal region bound by a wonderful bridge-tunnel, and one or two well-placed vessels, as we have known for decades, could easily keep everyone indoors, if you catch my drift. Need I say more? Think about it.
You can never understand your true religion. God is simply a name to describe a mystery and power. In order to find out who or what is god you need to see what is taboo, what cannot be questioned, what is sacred. And if questioned the god’s devotees view it as a scandal.
Human rights is everywhere like a god. It flows through institutions and individuals, the [western] world is obsessed with human rights. Billions of dollars are spent annually on worshipping it. There are many monuments dedicated to the god.
Imagine what would happen if people stopped believing in human rights? It loses legitimacy. All its monuments become ruins.
On the other hand, communism, being an accepted object of criticism, cannot be sacred.
The real socialist hate the democrats. They've got plans to put them in gulags. They don't care about the conservatives or the churches. It's all the talk about, that and after they take care of the democrats, they'll go after the WEF.
Theophilus is absolutely right about organizing. I remember a man saying long ago that it is a blessing and a curse for Americans to have free speech online, because it means they can always find people who think the same, even if they are halfway across the country. But that also means they have less desire to organize with those who live in the same town and who only agree halfway.
I joined a political party that criticizes immigration but that doesn't say anything about the real people behind the media. And some members even praise them. Most American nationalists I see online would be too holier-than-thou to join a party like that. But that's where I met my best friend. And I met several others who also knew the whole truth. It was also very useful to see how the organizing and tedious, systematic work is done.
I remember Dr. Pierce wrote that if you simply write a letter to the editor in the local newspaper but you are not including the name of an organization, then your criticism doesn't matter. A certain German politician noted that those who talked about "spontaneous resistance" after the first world war would simply scatter in the face of the organized Left. What do you do when you're alone and the target? In the U.S., you can join the GOP, even though we all know their faults. Nowadays you won't be shut out for criticizing mass immigration. And join other existing organizations. You are not selling out, you are there to find like-minded souls and to inform those who can be informed.
What kind of ruling elite seeks to destabilize and destroy the very society over which it rules? It's almost as if our ruling elite have their own homeland, separate and apart from our country, to which they plan to escape if their gambit backfires and things get bad enough for them. Very strange! 🤔
Anyway, great post! Very insightful and timely!
That supersaturation is a brilliant metaphor
Annus Mirablis ! Pinch faced little ninnies out, organizing in !
"Ironically, the one thing that has done “the Feds” job more than anything else has been the division-sowing by the pinched-faced little ninnies who always label any call to action as the work of “Feds,” no matter how innocuous and scrupulously legal it may be."
It's true that some mass shootings indeed look strange. I forget the name of that one school shooting after which one of the students exploited it to get money through politics. But I remember that there were tons of warnings about that shooter being violent and about to do something, and they ignored it. This in a country where a little kid was sent home from school for biting his pop-tart into the shape of a gun.
In Britain, just a week before the EU referendum, a mentally ill man shot a Labour politician and her Muslim aide. This made the pro-independence side cancel their campaigning for several days, because apparently they had to atone for being pro-independent. How odd that something like that has NEVER happened in Britain either before or after. Only right before the most crucial vote.
However, regarding ISIS, they are obviously not a U.S. agent. In that case the U.S. wouldn't have been bombing them in Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan. In Afghanistan, the U.S. quietly functioned as the Talibans' air force against ISIS in one region.
But Washington did approve of Qatar and Saudi Arabia funding those who became ISIS. Washington approved of Turkey letting in their recruits across the border, and said nothing about Erdogan's son buying oil from ISIS and shipping it off (to some unknown country, but I'm guessing Israel). Washington sanctioned Syria even when the rebels were clearly dominated by al-Qaeda and ISIS, and Washington gave guns to front troops on the border which they knew were selling or giving the guns to ISIS and al-Q, who most of them later joined.
But they didn't control ISIS and did want them gone eventually, instead helping the Kurds take their territory. But this is too much nuance for some people. Just like those who go rah-rah for anything Washington does, "our side," so there are those who think anyone Washington is against must be defended. In both cases it's about being too lazy and simply too d... un-unintelligent to grasp nuance.
It especially sickens me to see people defend the tyrant Khadaffi. Those who do so know nothing. "He wanted an African currency so that's why they wanted him gone!" LOL First of all no one cared about his fantasies. Second, this supposed "pan-African" took Libya's college kids, gave them two months of training, and sent them to invade Chad. For some war glory. It was a disaster and only a competent Libyan general prevented Chad's soldiers from following them back to Libya. Khadaffi also had his guards kidnap little girls across the country, and women from France, which he kept as sex slaves in the basement under his palace. They never got to see the sun. He beat them, urinated on them and killed many of them. Those he didn't kill when he tired of them were beaten bloody and left in ditches or parking lots. Khadaffi also armed Blacks from Mali and elsewhere to control the people.
Or they'll defend the de facto dictator Ortega in Nicaragua because Biden criticized his sham election, so he must be good. Ortega is a leftist, but even other Central Asian leftist presidents condemned him, as well as the social democrats in Spain. He banned and arrested opposition leaders before the election and forbade them from campaigning, and controlled the election completely. If he ever left office and presidential immunity he'd be tried for the disappearence of hundreds of student protesters years back, so he clings on. BUT, if WASHINGTON criticized him, he must be defended.
But I digress.
Those who say "ISIS was a U.S. agent" or who defend Khadaffi and people like him, because Washington must be the only bad actor in existence, never know anything about these groups or people aside from on a tabloid level.
Kurt Schlichter wrote a plausible novel about a team based strike like this in “The Attack.” It’s given me a lot to think about with my locality, my power plant, my role as a volunteer firefighter, an armed citizen and a head of a household.
"What joins men together ... is not the sharing of bread but the sharing of enemies." — Cormac McCarthy, Blood Meridian
As the intersection of the container ship with the supports in Baltimore illustrates, we have even more to watch out for than villains at our doors. The East Coast marine military force sits within a coastal region bound by a wonderful bridge-tunnel, and one or two well-placed vessels, as we have known for decades, could easily keep everyone indoors, if you catch my drift. Need I say more? Think about it.
You can never understand your true religion. God is simply a name to describe a mystery and power. In order to find out who or what is god you need to see what is taboo, what cannot be questioned, what is sacred. And if questioned the god’s devotees view it as a scandal.
Human rights is everywhere like a god. It flows through institutions and individuals, the [western] world is obsessed with human rights. Billions of dollars are spent annually on worshipping it. There are many monuments dedicated to the god.
Imagine what would happen if people stopped believing in human rights? It loses legitimacy. All its monuments become ruins.
On the other hand, communism, being an accepted object of criticism, cannot be sacred.
The real socialist hate the democrats. They've got plans to put them in gulags. They don't care about the conservatives or the churches. It's all the talk about, that and after they take care of the democrats, they'll go after the WEF.
Theophilus is absolutely right about organizing. I remember a man saying long ago that it is a blessing and a curse for Americans to have free speech online, because it means they can always find people who think the same, even if they are halfway across the country. But that also means they have less desire to organize with those who live in the same town and who only agree halfway.
I joined a political party that criticizes immigration but that doesn't say anything about the real people behind the media. And some members even praise them. Most American nationalists I see online would be too holier-than-thou to join a party like that. But that's where I met my best friend. And I met several others who also knew the whole truth. It was also very useful to see how the organizing and tedious, systematic work is done.
I remember Dr. Pierce wrote that if you simply write a letter to the editor in the local newspaper but you are not including the name of an organization, then your criticism doesn't matter. A certain German politician noted that those who talked about "spontaneous resistance" after the first world war would simply scatter in the face of the organized Left. What do you do when you're alone and the target? In the U.S., you can join the GOP, even though we all know their faults. Nowadays you won't be shut out for criticizing mass immigration. And join other existing organizations. You are not selling out, you are there to find like-minded souls and to inform those who can be informed.