Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kirsten B.'s avatar

Importing a new new class of voters is a "strategy" is so utterly evil I cannot form the words to adequately describe it. It is a new level of nation destroying that is so insidious the mere prospect of it is enough to make Old Scratch himself blush. Not a single one of these criminal "newcomers" has a valid claim to be here, not one. Now of course, the big problem is not just shutting off the tap - it's getting rid of millions of these diabolical human parasites once they're deeply embedded here and used to free phones, rent, healthcare, education and pre paid debit cards being refilled on a twice monthly basis. The optics of mass raids and million man round ups will surely be played up by the media as the ultimate oppressor vs victim class theater, as it is designed. You are right; illegal immigration is our Issue Number One - there's not even a close second place.

Always it seems now, the right can only focus on "undoing" the crimes of the leftist political syndicate. They never get to move their own chess pieces forward because they have to focus all of their energies in a mad scramble to undo the damage of leftist radicals. I'm about as black pilled as they get these days - even if Trump does manage to eek out a win, it's still game over.

Expand full comment
Tell's avatar

People can look up "what if only white people voted" in Google. In 2012 Buzzfeed put together a series of electoral maps. If only Whites voted, Republicans would win every state except five by the coasts. (Wa, Or, Me, Vt, Ma.) But non-Whites IN EVERY SINGLE STATE vote overwhelmingly Left.

And it's the same in every single European country. Research shows that the social democrats would not have won a single election in Sweden after the 1990s without immigrant votes, and even the majority of workers have now abandoned the Left. (And it's arguably the most leftist West European country.) The leftists planned ahead - in the 1980s Labour in Britain actually put in print their plan to replace treacherous British voters (who gave Thatcher's Tories three overwhelming victories in a row) with immigrants. (Tony Blair won by seeming to ditch the economic Marxism. He replaced it with cultural Marxism. More than doubling college seats to indoctrinate youth, and claiming that Third World mass immigration was crucial to the economy. Once out of office, his adviser Andrew Neather admitted that the real objective had been "to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.")

Socialism - what in the U.S. since WWII is falsely called liberalism (which means reigning in the state) but which is actually the correct name for the whole Left, not just the name for the communists - was invented as a means to exploit elections. Those who couldn't get wealth otherwise would get it through parliament seats.

A certain German party leader wrote in the 1920s that the labor unions were taken over by people who simply used them. When business owners were willing to negotiate the union leaders upped their demands and fanned the hatred, demonizing those who ran businesses. Today, why is Big Labour completely pro-immigration in all aforementioned countries - Britain, Sweden, the U.S.? "Why do they turn against us?" Why did you think you were ever anything but a stepping stone for them to get money?

Just like feminists care NOTHING about women being raped by immigrants. When Arabs and Africans camped out by Calais, wanting to flood into Britain, feminists went there to have sex with them. They reveled in the feeling of dirtying their own race that way. When one woman was gang raped by the non-Whites, the others told her not to report it. At first she didn't, but when she did so anyway they cursed her online.

And while the feminists used to shout "burn the bra" and attack men for supposedly forcing women to dress decent, today feminists fawn over the hijab. They have opportunistic women in hijab speak at their events in Europe, about how LIBERATING it is to wear a hijab. It "blocks the male gaze," just like blue hair, piercings and tattoos are meant to do.

In short, they will move from any position to another. The goal is simply to get votes and shock troops, so they can get the well-paid parliament seats. Those who aren't in parliaments get a flood of tax money to their organizations, so they get money despite having useless college degrees.

All of this is enabled by non-Whites. They will turn all of the West into Los Angeles, Detroit, London, Paris and Malmo.

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts