The words "...an honest discussion about..." from a leftist means the leftist will start talking and telling you what to think and the 'discussion' will only end when you agree you were guilty of wrongthink and now you agree with everything the speaker parroted.
As popular sentiment has it, "You can have my weapon when you pry it from my cold dead fingers." If you are still alive to do so.
Liberals and commies are so damned blind to what will happen when White's no longer exist. There will be mass balkanization of the world and more mass deaths than they've ever seen.
By then, they'll have been lined up and shot by the people they wanted to move in.
The third world can be seen as a gun control issue. Societies with average IQs of 85 and below, incapable of sustaining a modern state, yet with access to explosives.
"I, like most other reasonable people, have no desire to see another civil war in America"
Yeah, well I desire a country with an actual border. I desire a country where the government does what's best for the people. No one seems to give a shit about our desires so they're irrelevant. The only question is will we cowardly submit to our replacement by third world barbarians or will we fight for our survival. If we do choose a fight to the death, then the sooner the better before they import millions more savages.
Living in Europe, where guns are hard to come by, my thought of any danger they might pose to my person is attenuated by the wish that, should I (or a more deserving individual) be targeted for murder, I'd rather a bullet in the head than being hacked to death because my enemy only has recourse to cleavers or axes.
On the separate topic of the mindless mass murders mainly in the USA, it has been widely claimed that the perpetrators take this action because of the psychiatric drugs they have been prescribed. Again, it is Big Pharma which is the ultimate culprit.
It’s quite easy to construct a shotgun for about £5 with materials from a plumbing supply shop. The French Resistance used them quite a bit in WW2. Research Pipe shotguns.
That's the crux of the issue. While it would be pleasant to knock off all their retarded minions, we need to be able to get at the people who run Big Pharma, the WEF, Blackrock, the CIA and all the rest of the globalists. That's the hard part.
When a leftist says they want “an honest conversation about race”, what they really mean is that they want to give you a condescending lecture about race.
Amerikaners need more than just small arms. Each of us needs to research the design elements of directional anti-personnel mines, anti-armor recoilless launchers, and other tools of the ugly trade of war.
Sadly, at this point the idea of “whites” is just DEI for Slavs, Irish people, and Bulgarians. The Anglospheric white, with names like Wentworth or Hollingside (who would have considered all the above as no better than Mexicans) is long a minority.
The point is that contemporary notions of white nationalism or concerns about whites or “hyperboreans” are a lot more inclusive than similar notions in the past. Whether Bulgarians are Turkic or Slavs is nugatory.
The words "...an honest discussion about..." from a leftist means the leftist will start talking and telling you what to think and the 'discussion' will only end when you agree you were guilty of wrongthink and now you agree with everything the speaker parroted.
As popular sentiment has it, "You can have my weapon when you pry it from my cold dead fingers." If you are still alive to do so.
Liberals and commies are so damned blind to what will happen when White's no longer exist. There will be mass balkanization of the world and more mass deaths than they've ever seen.
By then, they'll have been lined up and shot by the people they wanted to move in.
The third world can be seen as a gun control issue. Societies with average IQs of 85 and below, incapable of sustaining a modern state, yet with access to explosives.
"I, like most other reasonable people, have no desire to see another civil war in America"
Yeah, well I desire a country with an actual border. I desire a country where the government does what's best for the people. No one seems to give a shit about our desires so they're irrelevant. The only question is will we cowardly submit to our replacement by third world barbarians or will we fight for our survival. If we do choose a fight to the death, then the sooner the better before they import millions more savages.
Never give up your guns. In fact, buy more. An armed society is a polite society.
Living in Europe, where guns are hard to come by, my thought of any danger they might pose to my person is attenuated by the wish that, should I (or a more deserving individual) be targeted for murder, I'd rather a bullet in the head than being hacked to death because my enemy only has recourse to cleavers or axes.
On the separate topic of the mindless mass murders mainly in the USA, it has been widely claimed that the perpetrators take this action because of the psychiatric drugs they have been prescribed. Again, it is Big Pharma which is the ultimate culprit.
It’s quite easy to construct a shotgun for about £5 with materials from a plumbing supply shop. The French Resistance used them quite a bit in WW2. Research Pipe shotguns.
That's the crux of the issue. While it would be pleasant to knock off all their retarded minions, we need to be able to get at the people who run Big Pharma, the WEF, Blackrock, the CIA and all the rest of the globalists. That's the hard part.
Gates of Toledo comes to mind
Forgot how good this was. Thanks for republishing it.
When a leftist says they want “an honest conversation about race”, what they really mean is that they want to give you a condescending lecture about race.
Amerikaners need more than just small arms. Each of us needs to research the design elements of directional anti-personnel mines, anti-armor recoilless launchers, and other tools of the ugly trade of war.
https://kaiserbasileus.substack.com/p/libertarian-fascist-gun-control
“mobilisation”. why is zed hated and neglected?
Sadly, at this point the idea of “whites” is just DEI for Slavs, Irish people, and Bulgarians. The Anglospheric white, with names like Wentworth or Hollingside (who would have considered all the above as no better than Mexicans) is long a minority.
Are Bulgarians not Slavs..? Seems redundant. Or maybe you have a personal gripe with them?
I’m pretty sure that was not the key point to take out.
I was hoping you’d indulge my fleeting curiosity, not that deep.
The point is that contemporary notions of white nationalism or concerns about whites or “hyperboreans” are a lot more inclusive than similar notions in the past. Whether Bulgarians are Turkic or Slavs is nugatory.