30 Comments

The problem is each false narrative must succeed enough for the subsequent narratives to be believed.

They fucked up hard with Covid, then double-downed with J6, then double-downed with Monkeypox, etc., etc,

Each time they do this, they lose a little more of their captive audience.

Beware of binary thinking: These people are evil AND stupid.

BTW If you know anybody who took the jab and is hurting from it (or has cancer from it), these might help:

Covid 19 vaccine damage repair protocols:

https://davenarby.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-damage-repair-protocol

Vitamin D for cancer:

https://starpower.substack.com/p/new-real-hope-for-those-with-cancer

Microphage treatment for cancer:

https://knowledgeofhealth.com/what-if-cancer-was-already-cured/

Be of good cheer, we're gonna make it.

Expand full comment

Absolutely correct. They pushed hard on COVID because much of that narrative (and the advance of its attendant agenda) was built on a framework similar to that upon which "climate change" has been built. They're deathly afraid that if the COVID narrative collapses (it is doing so even now, if it hasn't already), the "climate change" narrative will become more vulnerable to people seeing the parallels and coming to the common-sense conclusion that it is all smoke-and-mirrors too.

Expand full comment

Each time they do this, they lose a little more of their captive audience.

I agree. I think the fact that the vast majority of people dismissed monkeypox is a good sign. Every time these people open their mouths, they lose more credibility. Public distrust of institutions is at an all time high, and I don't think it will return to pre 2020 levels anytime soon. Once you see these people for who they are, you can't unsee it.

Our focus now should be on trying to withdraw from our corrupt culture and becoming as self-sufficient as possible. Then we can happily watch as they destroy themselves.

Expand full comment

I am 1000x levered long on public distrust in institutions.

Expand full comment

Are you confident they need our trust to move their agenda forward? They have our data, can they not coerce our consent?

“One of the main justifications China has for its new social credit system is that its society lacks the necessary trust to conduct business with confidence. The system's original proposal puts it this way: "[Such an initiative] will forge a public opinion environment where keeping trust is glorious. It will strengthen sincerity in government affairs, commercial sincerity, social sincerity and the construction of judicial credibility."

www. entrepreneur. com/business-news/social-credit-tech-is-coming-5-ways-for-us/321560

Expand full comment

By definition, you can't coerce consent. At best, you can coerce compliance among the compliant. The problem is you end up creating more and more "sandbaggers", people who "go Galt" in lots of little ways and withdraw their participation from the system. They work a little less at their dead-end job, look for side hustles, develop networks, try out more secure ways of communicating, salt their online data, give the government drone a bit more run-around, research the rules a bit more (so as to make their enemies follow their own rules), get more involved in local politics, become more self-sufficient and independent, maybe buy some silver, gold, or Bitcoin for the first time (or you just buy moar)... Etc., etc.

There's literally thousands of little ways you can fuck 'em right back.

The more this grinds on, the more this feedback loop intensifies, and eventually you get a Mr. and Mrs. Ceaușescu photo-op.

Expand full comment

I like the way you think.

Expand full comment

“Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. Therefore, take up the full armor of God, so that you will be able to resist in the evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm. Stand firm therefore, having girded your loins with truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace; in addition to all, taking up the shield of faith with which you will be able to extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.”

‭‭Ephesians‬ ‭6‬:‭11‬-‭17‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

https://bible.com/bible/100/eph.6.11-17.NASB1995

Expand full comment

Nice battering of quite a few holy cows 👌 Though resilient & deep-entrenched beasts they are, won’t easily loosen their tight grip on our society of thoroughly conditioned smarties 😉

Mutex (mutually exclusive) memeplexes in close proximity = tribal wars. Psyops much more than close-horizon propaganda are designed to usurp & flatten the memespace, to try mould it into more uniform & docile shape. For the differences in understanding of what reality is amplify the differences in notions of what reality should be ← not remotely an outcome tptb wish nor would ever be happy with 😉

Much à propos, audaciously bold spins work like a charm through dialling up the cognitive dissonance to levels too hard to bear, too costly to resist—to the point we won’t believe our own lying eyes 😳 → https://brownstone.org/articles/global-health-and-the-art-of-really-big-lies/

~~

PS (unnecessary) Round pegs *love* square holes 😜

Expand full comment

COVID was itself a psyops masterwork. The ground was laid for months by seeding stories in the alternative and dissident online media ecosystem, while the regime media insisted it was just the flu bro. Establishment media taking this position served as confirmatory evidence of the potential seriousness of COVID among dissidents, who had become accustomed to taking the opposite position to any narrative being spread by the corporate press. The result was that when the fear mongering was ramped up to 11 among the general populace, the subset most likely to run interference was already pushing the pandemic narrative instead.

Expand full comment

One of the main takeaways I have is that the Regime is reaching diminishing returns.

The Narrative cycles come faster and faster, last shorter, and are believed by less of the audience each time.

You can sense the Regime's increasing desperation — but this is their entire playbook, they only have one inherited set of strategies, and are unwilling to adapt.

Expand full comment

I agree up to a point. The declining credibility of regime narratives is surpassed by the creeping paralysis of the regime's victims. The latest sham election has gone unchallenged. The regime needs legitimacy, but it will settle for passivity.

Expand full comment

It’s over.

Truly.

We are too far gone. Patriots and truth seekers aren’t even organized. The time to act was years and years ago. Many tried to warn us, including the likes of Eisenhower and JFK but no one listened. We were too busy buying cheap Chinese goods at Walmart and watching TV.

Once you leave this country, and say, visit Tokyo, you realize that globalism has come and is here to stay. They’ve kept the truth from us here in the US with a slow intro. Europe, parts of Asia….already fully ensconced in the New World.

Expand full comment

1. have faith in no man fully, except for Jesus

2. if they are for pretty much any war, they are probably globalists

3. if they are dividers of race, gender, ... they are probably globalists

4. beware the fake jews in the synagogue of satan and their control of money and everything else

Expand full comment

Brilliant.

Expand full comment

Pretty good differentiation between "psyops" and "propaganda."

Psyops has a bit broader range of meanings also.

What has happened to our culture is best described as a covert influence operation that took on a life of its own. It started around 1920, was actively worked on for about 10-15 years, and then the operators were all slaughtered. But the beauty of covert influence "payloads" and methods is that even when the operators are dead the targets can continue spreading the payload forever.

A couple of articles, and a book that go into detail:

https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2010/08/01/covert-influence-russian-operations-changed-america-part-2/

https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2010/07/31/covert-influence-russian-operations-changed-america-part-1/

www.willingaccomplices.com

Expand full comment

Not a single mention of the Jews, the perfidious tribe driving all of this. What we’re seeing is a continuation of the 2,000-year-old war waged against God by the deicidal Jews. They’re diabolically driven to destroy every last shred of Christendom.

Those who don’t understand this are only groping in the dark.

Wake up. Start reading these immediately:

The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit

&

The Jews and Moral Subversion

Get them only at the Fidelity Press site. They’re too real for Amazon.

“[T]he Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men; prohibiting us to speak to the Gentiles, that they may be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the end.”

-St. Paul at 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16

Expand full comment

The most important thing you can do is follow the money and question EVERYTHING. Nothing should be off limits as we've been lied to about everything for as long as the world has been here.

Expand full comment

I was right there with you until this paragraph: "Yet, there are very real genetic differences that exist between between (mostly) discreet ethnic and racial groups - and among other things this is impacting the future of American civilisational competency. Despite the best efforts of critical race theorists to mask the real reason, it cannot honestly be denied that certain ethnic groups are more prone to crime than others. From an historical perspective, republican forms of government in the Middle Ages were only really successfully maintained by high IQ populations that could exercise low time preference and the ability to plan ahead rationally, something that also makes the continuation of popular, representative government in the USA increasingly unlikely in the long term. Yet, many people are simply unable to even consider, much less honestly accept, any of this because of decades of post-civil rights movement brainwashing."

Yes, there are "very real genetic differences" between "ethnic groups," though those difference have nothing to do with the impetus to commit crimes. In other words, those differences are not neurological. People who commit crimes have sociological differences and sometimes mental illness, which does not differentiate between "ethnic groups." Property and drug crime is most often committed by people at the low end of the financial ladder. Unplanned crimes of passion are committed by all ethnic groups of all levels of income. Financial crime is most often committed by white people at the high end of the financial ladder. Serial murder is most often committed by white people in the low-middle of the financial ladder. Genocide is most often committed by white people in governments. What 95% of all these people have in common, however, is not race, but gender.

Then there is the doozy about "republican forms of government in the Middle Ages." What were those then? Examples of those must abound! Not. We are to believe that in an era when most people could not even read, that these "republicans" in the Middle Ages were "high IQ" and had the ability to plan ahead, whereas, apparently people today (because we are ethnically mixed?) are low IQ and can't plan ahead. But I thought those "ethnic" people today were criminals? Don't you need intelligence and the ability to plan ahead to commit most crimes? And assuredly, those ethnically heterogeneous high-IQ rational people in the Middle Ages who were somehow in republics must not have committed crimes, right? Oh wait, they did, and in higher rates than today.

Go back to bed. You are drunk.

P.S. What is a "discreet" ethnic group? One that keeps to itself? LOL.

Expand full comment

Plain amazing: did we read the same text? Shirley, you jest 🤭

Expand full comment

Well, I quoted from the text exactly, so you tell me.

Expand full comment

Y’know, I’m gonna turn 360° on my heel an walk away. Nothing personnel 🙃

Expand full comment

I think the most prolific serial killer in history was a black man named Sam Little or something.

Anyway I do agree that if you grow up in a family or culture of crime. No matter what color you are. You are most likely going to get into the criminal lifestyle.

Expand full comment

The vast majority of serial killers are Caucasian men. There has been only one female serial killer, and very very few black serial killers.

Expand full comment

Yeah, but as far as count goes it would be like Micheal Jordan playing little Stevie Kerr (Ted Bundy) in a game of one on one. So, I think you should always add that as an asterisk. I knew you were going to come back with that argument. lol

There has been other black serial killers too.

Just thinking the crime family thing also ties into democrat politics. What? Pelosi's from a crime family, and other dem's. I'm sure there are some Rino's too.

Expand full comment

https://new-iq-test.com/iq-by-country/ It's interesting that we freely attach physical superiority or inferiority to some races and ethnicities but feel IQ is taboo.

Expand full comment

That is immaterial to the claim being made here. The author has no evidence of IQ from any ethnicity. His claims are all mere assertions.

Expand full comment

Linda, you really believe that evolution stopped for humans 60,000 years ago? Quite the Pollyanna arent we.

Expand full comment

Huh? Nonsensical. I said nothing indicated I held such a belief.

Expand full comment

Excellent article!

Expand full comment