The Left is a Subversive Faction

“The common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.”

Those familiar with the writings of the American Founding Fathers know that one of the great fears of the founders was the formation of factions. Factions are groups of people within a polity (and the form of government of that polity really doesn’t affect their formation all that much) who seek to use power solely or primarily to gain more power for themselves and to divert power and monies into their own hands. Many early American writers sounded the alarm against this phenomenon and our first president, George Washington, even warned against this tendency in his farewell speech, quoted above.

Now what we need to understand is that factions are not really contiguous with “political parties” or “interest groups,” though of course there can be some overlap. A group is not a “faction,” per se, just because they are advocating for the interests of a certain subset of the population. Indeed, whether in republican, democratic, or monarchic contexts, it’s pretty much a truism in human government that public policy is the distillation of the results of various competing interests. In many cases, however (and this especially applies during the growth phases of a polity’s demographic-structural cycle, which usually feature less intraelite competition and more intraelite cooperation and a shared sense of solidarity), competing special interests and parties will “keep their eye on the ball” and be willing to compromise for the good of the people and the nation as a while. It’s generally during the secular downturns, the periods of demographic-structural collapse phase, that intraelite competition most heavily contributes to the formation of genuine factions. These factions occur when a particular group seeks to gain and enhance its power at the expense of the unity and/or the safety of the nation for its own selfish purposes. The faction doesn’t care about the nation as a whole but is focused on its own oligarchical concerns and what can be used to accrue more resources (of all kinds) to itself.

This fear of faction was had for good reason. If there’s one thing you can say for our founders and their generation, it is that they were very well steeped in classical and medieval history, philosophy, and civics. As a result, there were very aware of the damage that factions could do to the safety and freedom of a state. They knew of the factions who could come to power and attempt to extirpate the longstanding, legitimate leadership of a city or an empire. They were fully cognizant of the subversion of the commons, the looting of the treasuries, the sabotage of a nation’s defences in the face of outside threats or incoming foreigners, the undermining of social unity. They knew the history of many a city and kingdom which had fallen to revolution or to external enemies because of the machinations of factions.

This kind of threat is precisely what we face from the Left today, not just in America but all across the civilised world.

The Left and its institutionalists are a faction - exactly the type of faction which George Washington warned us against and which the founders desperately tried to avoid. And they have been this way for decades as they wormed their way into our institutions, hollowing them out and capturing them for their own factional interests. Indeed, it is within the very nature of the Left’s ideology to subvert and eventually destroy every competing system, like a virus that sickens and eventually kills its host.

Pretty much everything the Left does is specifically for the purpose of advancing the factional interests of its oligarchs and their various clients, regardless of things like laws, written constitutions, prior convention, generally held ideas about fundamental fairness, or anything else. This is why you see things like Democrats funneling millions of dollars into their own pockets that were donated to help California fire victims, using in-house organs like ActBlue. It’s why you see Democrats channeling money that should go to help North Carolina flood victims away from their intended recipients, mainly because that part of the country doesn’t vote Blue. It’s why they want to shake down the majority of the country to give “reparations” to one of their ideological coalition members. It’s why Democrat-appointed district judges are still issuing sweeping injunctions designed to hobble President Trump’s agenda, despite being told not to by the Supreme Court (you know, their bosses?). It’s why they have put an ideological two-tiered legal framework into place that disadvantages Whites (who don’t tend to vote for the Left as much) in the workplace, in their choice of neighbours they live around, and in their ability to defend themselves from crime and violence caused by Democratic client groups. And these are really just the tip of the iceberg of examples which I could give.

The Left does not care about the majority of people in this country, they don’t care for our native working class, they don’t care about the unity and safety of the nation. They only care about acquiring more power over you and me while lining their pockets with our money. The majority of people in White, western nations are literally just a combination of obstacle and paypig for these people.

One of the driving factors in the founders’ abhorrence for factionalism was the fear of foreign influence over the republic. The introduction of “diversity” was well-understood to be a tool of tyrants who wanted to usurp the people of a nation and replace them with more pliable foreigners. This likely explains the fact that one of the first acts of Congress under the new Constitution was to pass the Naturalization Act of 1790 which limited citizenship to individuals who were closely compatible with our founding stock. This, also, has a strong basis in their reading of history and political philosophy.

Indeed, one of the major contributors to that discussion was Aristotle, who made several pointed observations in his Politics about the tendency on the part of illegitimate governments to use foreigners as a means of suppressing and circumventing the native people of a land,

“It is a habit of tyrants never to like anyone who has a spirit of dignity and independence. The tyrant claims a monopoly of such qualities for himself; he feels that anybody who asserts a rival dignity, or acts with independence, is threatening his own superiority and the despotic power of his tyranny; he hates him accordingly as a subverter of his own authority. It is also a habit of tyrants to prefer the company of aliens to that of citizens at table and in society; citizens, they feel, are enemies, but aliens will offer no opposition.”

This is further observed in that legitimate rulers install their own people into positions of power while tyrants seek to fill these with a multivarious mass of mongrelised foreigners,

“The guard of a king is composed of citizens: that of a tyrant is composed of foreigners.”

Likewise, his observations were generally that “diversity” and “multiculturalism” led to strife, civil conflict, and eventually the genocide or expulsion of either the incomers or the natives,

“Heterogeneity of stocks may lead to faction – at any rate until they have had time to assimilate. A city cannot be constituted from any chance collection of people, or in any chance period of time. Most of the cities which have admitted settlers, either at the time of their foundation or later, have been troubled by faction. For example, the Achaeans joined with settlers from Troezen in founding Sybaris, but expelled them when their own numbers increased; and this involved their city in a curse. At Thurii the Sybarites quarreled with the other settlers who had joined them in its colonization; they demanded special privileges, on the ground that they were the owners of the territory, and were driven out of the colony. At Byzantium the later settlers were detected in a conspiracy against the original colonists, and were expelled by force; and a similar expulsion befell the exiles from Chios who were admitted to Antissa by the original colonists. At Zancle, on the other hand, the original colonists were themselves expelled by the Samians whom they admitted. At Apollonia, on the Black Sea, factional conflict was caused by the introduction of new settlers; at Syracuse the conferring of civic rights on aliens and mercenaries, at the end of the period of the tyrants, led to sedition and civil war; and at Amphipolis the original citizens, after admitting Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by the colonists they had admitted.”

Keep in mind that the “diversity” in question here were various groups of (from our perspective, at least) extremely culturally similar Greeks. Just imagine what can happen when you start throwing together biotrash from all over the world into our countries.

This type of treasonous subversion is exactly what the Left has been trying to do with its agenda of mass third world immigration and this shows us why they are so angry about this agenda being threatened. The gameplan was to import millions of immigrants, both “legally” and “illegally” (though functionally, the effects of the two are not much different), and eventually convert them into voters who would then serve as reliable clients for left-wing factions. All of this is done under the auspice of “extending democracy,” which only really makes sense once you understand that “democracy” does not really exist except as a Regime enforcement mechanism for maintaining their own power.

What needs to be understood is that the current elements of opposition to Trump - whether these be judges, in the intelligence agencies, the deep state, congressional leftists, or whatever else - are illegitimate in their holds upon their offices and other positions. From an historical perspective, Trump versus the Left as we currently see it is extremely similar to the perennial conflicts between legitimate rulers versus subversive factions that have taken place across political history for almost 3,000 recorded years. The Left - and this really extends much further back than Trump’s arrival on the scene - is illegitimate and its enjoyment of offices and positions of power are also illegitimate. Indeed, for the good of this country and her people, all means should be pursued to remove these people from power and prevent them from ever obtaining it again. It is prime facie invalid for this faction to misuse public funds and public offices to hinder actions that are objectively for the good of this nation and our people.

While I disagree with democracy (and indeed, am not convince that it actually exists), nevertheless if that’s the polite fiction that currently grants legitimacy under our system, then formalism requires that we work within that framework until such a time as we formally change it (which may come sooner than we think, depending on the timing and severity of our approaching collapse point). But understand that the Left itself is fast doing our job for us in discrediting “democracy.” The Left - and especially the American Left - has little impulse control and will continue to accelerate both their drive towards the revolutionary overthrow of our current system and the destruction of their own credibility in the process. At this point, everybody who is not his or herself a radical left-wing fanatic basically hates the Left and their exoteric organs such as the Democratic Party. Their social agenda is in ruins and their fiscal program basically now consists of impotently opposing all of the stuff that Trump is doing successfully. Unbelievably, the Democrats are viewed even less favourably than are congressional Republicans, despite the GOP’s best efforts to distance themselves from their own base.

But that doesn’t mean their illegitimate faction will easily give up power. Having come this far, they’re too all in. They’re not about to stand idly by while real Americans, real Canadians, real Europeans unravel their demographic, financial, and political plans. Expect them to try to become more repressive (witness the UK’s new “child safety” law that is real just about preventing online free speech). Expect them to engineer more false flags to give them “justification” for more gun and speech control.

This cannot be allowed to succeed. By whatever means, the Left’s faction across our various nations must be stopped. Right now, they’re in a race against time - fully prosecute their revolution against the various peoples of the western nations before the collapse point of our current demographic-structural cycle hits and circumstances break free from their control. At that point, anything can happen, provided we’re ready to take advantage of the situation. But even before then, the Left must be prevented from bringing to pass the subversive agenda they’re trying to implement.